Skip to content

/subexposureprecise

/subexposureprecise <sky_background_rate> [camera] [read_noise] [noise_tolerance]

Calculates a precise sub-exposure length for TRACKED astrophotography using Robin Glover’s (SharpCap) real formula, confirmed directly from Glover’s own posts on SharpCap’s official forum: sub-exposure = C × read noise² ÷ sky background rate. For a rough starting-point range instead, needing no camera-specific numbers, see /subexposure.

Usage: /subexposureprecise camera: [saved profile] sky_background_rate: 0.6 — or read_noise: 1.5 instead of camera if you haven’t saved one. Get sky_background_rate (the Sky Background Electron Rate, in e⁻/pixel/s — a different thing from “sky brightness” in the Bortle/SQM sense, since this one also depends on your optics and camera, not just the sky) from [SharpCap’s free Sky Background Calculator] (https://tools.sharpcap.co.uk) — deliberately not derived from Bortle class alone here, since that would need combining Bortle/SQM with your focal ratio, pixel size, and quantum efficiency together, a relationship SharpCap’s own tool computes but doesn’t publish as an open formula. Add noise_tolerance if you want tighter (2%, more subs needed) or looser (10%, fewer/longer subs) than the 5% default.

Narrowband filters (e.g. a 3nm Ha filter) don’t need a different formula or a separate multiplier — get a fresh sky_background_rate from SharpCap’s calculator FOR that filter (entering its bandwidth in nm) rather than reusing a broadband value, and this same formula naturally produces the much longer sub-exposure narrowband needs, since a narrowband filter’s effect is entirely captured by how much it lowers the measured sky background rate. Glover himself walked through exactly this case on the SharpCap forum: a 3nm filter measured around 0.14 e⁻/pixel/s versus a typical broadband value an order of magnitude higher, which is why the required sub-exposure jumps so much. Select Monochrome in SharpCap’s calculator for a narrowband filter even on a mono camera in a filter wheel — his own reasoning is that essentially all the light passing a narrowband filter falls in one channel anyway. (A “×25 for narrowband” rule of thumb circulates online, but it traces to one forum poster’s own guess, self-flagged as “maybe incorrect” — not confirmed by Glover the way the core formula was, so it’s not used here.)

Treat the result as a genuine minimum, not a target to hit exactly — many imagers go 2-3× longer on a well-guided mount and get excellent results.

Parameters

NameRequiredDescription
sky_background_rateYesSky Background Electron Rate in e-/pixel/s, from SharpCap's free Sky Background Calculator
cameraNoA saved camera profile with read noise (see /camera) -- alternative to read_noise
read_noiseNoCamera's read noise in electrons -- alternative to camera, overrides a saved camera's value
noise_toleranceNoHow much read noise to accept (defaults to Standard/5%) Options: Tight (2% noise, more subs needed), Standard (5% noise, balanced) [default], Loose (10% noise, fewer/longer subs).